By Jim Fetzer (with Dennis Cimino)
The absence of evidence that should be present and the presence of evidence that should be absent are keys to unraveling Sandy Hook. And the suppression of the new documentary, “We need to talk about Sandy Hook”, appears to be backfiring. Proof of fraud and fakery continues to mount, substantiating it was a drill and no children died.
An interesting article comparing Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing was published by A.J. MacDonald, “Sandy Hook: Hoax or Truth?” He observed that, “The Boston bombing had everything Sandy Hook didn’t: video footage of the bombing, photos of the bombing, photos and videos of the wounded, and lots of blood.” But studies of the Boston bombing reveal the use of actors, fake blood and a staged sequence of events.
“The claim that Sandy Hook was a hoax”, he continues, “is founded upon the fact that we have no video of the shooter, no photos of the shooter, no video or photos of the victims, and no blood. And it seems to me that if lack of evidence is evidence of a hoax, then the Boston bombing isn’t a hoax. I’ve written on this subject before, and it boils down to epistemology, or answering the question: How do we know anything?”
But MacDonald only has it half-right: the absence of evidence counts as evidence only if the evidence that is absent should be present. And the presence of evidence only counts provided it is authentic rather than faked. When some evidence is on both sides, the challenge is to assess their respective weight on the basis of scientific principles of reasoning. Some cases, as we shall see, are easier to appraise than others.
Remember. Given the legal principle, “Fraud vitiates everything”, if it is provably false in even one material respect, the official account has been thereby vitiated. That is untrue of attempted falsifications, however, since any number of them could turn out to be mistaken as long as others that remain are valid. And, for those who want a refresher of the dimensions of the hoax, see “Sandy Hook: Ten more proofs that vitiate the official account”. It didn’t happen.
Absence of evidence that should be present
Consider the DASHCAM footage of the Sandy Hook parking lot at the times and locations where, according to the official report by Danbury State’s Attorney, Stephen Sedensky, some 469 students (not to mention the 75 staff, teachers, custodians, administrators and such) should have been evacuated. When we look at the footage, we discover they aren’t there! And they aren’t there because no evacuation was taking place:
The claim is often made that you can’t prove a negative. But in this case, we just did: the DASHCAM footage shows that no evacuation was taking place. An even simpler case is the claim that there is an elephant in your living room. If you go to that location and find no indications of the presence of an elephant, you are entitled to infer there’s no elephant in your living room. And if there was no evacuation, it didn’t happen.
Presence of evidence that should be absent
You might think that I have blundered by overlooking the “iconic” photograph by Shannon Hicks, which appears to show fifteen children being led away from the school by a police woman. This image made its way around the world and was published on virtually every front page of every newspaper in print. But we know now that there was a second photograph, also taken by Shannon Hicks, that gave the game away:
The public was taken in by Shannon’s first photograph, even though it was a cold day on 14 December 2012: the temperature was 28*F and there was frost on the ground. But no one paid attention to signs that it had to have been taken earlier in the year (taken as early as October). And had it not been for the discovery of her second photo, she might have gotten away with it:
Once the second photo emerged, however, the game was up: parents would not have been present in time for the emergency evacuation, where the road to the school was blocked at the firehouse; and they certainly would not have been standing with their arms folded had this been a bona fide shooting. In this case, we have the presence of evidence that should not be present at all.
Another inexplicable presence of evidence
Those who have been following the case will appreciate how many times there is an absence of evidence that should be present (such as the missing oil stains in the Sandy Hook parking lot) and the presence of evidence that should be absent (such as the neon sign, “Everyone must check in”), which has intrigued students of Sandy Hook virtually from the beginning. Here it is:
Does anyone seriously believe that there would be a registration procedure at a school shooting massacre? What we have here is the presence of evidence that should be absent–like the Porta Potties, where Wolf has been refused information about who ordered them. And the reason appears to be that they were on the scene the day before, 13 December 2012, which, according to the manual that we have found covering this case, was only the drill to be presented as a live event the following day. Consider this man’s performance:
New information has surfaced that Gene Rosen works for FEMA, which is stunning, because Sandy Hook appears to have been a FEMA Capstone Event. What you see here suggests that FEMA has a cadre of adult and child actors who are available for FEMA-managed events. One of the fascinating features of this video is that it shows Gene Rosen with children in Texas at FEMA events, where the same children later appear at the White House while President Barack Obama signs 23 executive orders to control ownership of guns.
“We need to talk about Sandy Hook”
A new documentary, drawing upon video studies by many students of Sandy Hook, “We need to talk about Sandy Hook”, has been taken down again and again, primarily, it appears, on the basis of fabricated copyright claims by one “Lenny Posner” (aka Leonard P. Osner), who has the parental integrity to produce a fake death certificate for his alleged son, Noah.
A few days ago, I received an interesting critique of “We need to talk about Sandy Hook” from Dave Kraft, where his response, with regard to the performance of Gene Rosen, was comparable to that of other Sandy Hook skeptics. Here is what Dave had to say about the totality of the documentary, which is being taken down right and left and therefore must have compelling proof that it was a hoax:
Dear James,The first couple of segments really struck me as Kryptonite to the Sandy Hook hoax. I thought it faded a little after that. The segments on the more technical aspects don’t really have as much impact. The one on Gene’s various versions of the story about kids showing up at his house is just a stab to the heart of the hoax. The footage of him walking around the fire house is just so damaging, especially the segments with the split screen with the two female interviewers and the correction of the cameraman. The look on the female interviewers’ faces is priceless. One of them looks like she can barely contain her contempt for Gene’s terrible acting.To me the most compelling evidence is Wayne’s Carver’s press conference. Maybe the group thought too much had already been said about Wayne.1. Wayne Carver’s surreal antics is far and away my number one reason for not believing the official story2. The flanking cops reactions to Wayne’s performance and the video camera women in the background that is not operating her professional grade camera at the biggest news event of the decade!3. Paul Vance’s threats of prosecution for not buying his story; reminds me of the Holocaust deniers being put in prison.4. Governor’s shocking admission of advanced warning; even more telling was no reporter screaming “Who warned you, Governor????!!!!!!!!!!!!” I knew then it was not a real press conference.5. The non-grieving exhibited of all victims families, especially the sisters, brother and uncle of the teacher. You could see maybe the brother and uncle holding in the grief, but not both sisters too!6. The trail of money flowing like new wine at harvest time – out into the vanishing point of time. The fund raising by 911 victims’ families did not approach that of Sandy Hook – a much lesser event in scale and number of victims.7. Gene’s worst acting performance ever8. Missing evacuation of students reminds me of the four missing planes on 911 that were never reconstructed in hangers like they always do. They retrieved and reconstructed JFK Jr’s plane from the ocean floor.9. When George Stefanopolis and Anderson Cooper sat in directors chairs at the scene on TV, casually discussing mass murder like it was a prognostication of a college football game at Notre Dame. That completely blew my mind. It really cemented the idea the press was part of the scam like nothing else.10. The creation of the charity fund from the Lanza’s neighbor… that should have taken a few days. Where is his interview about knowing the Lanzas? Seems like they always interview the neighbors of mass murderers. How was he not relentlessly hounded for information? Did he hear the gunshots that killed Lanza’s mother? Did he see Adam load weapons into the car and drive away? The idea the fund was planned before hand could be doubted… that’s the problem with all the technical segments. Too abstract compared to the press conferences of the main players… Carver, Vance and Gov. Malloy.
Censorship of video backfiring
Rob Dew on Inforwars.com is joined by two of the filmmakers behind the video, “We Need To Talk About Sandy Hook”from the group, http://www.mediasolidarity.com, QK Ultra and Tyranny News, who talk about its viral success despite the ongoing, even fanatical, efforts to suppress it. The video brings together ten students of Sandy Hook, each of whom contributed their own segment to the 2.5 hour-long production:
Virtually on a daily basis, more and more revelations are coming forth, which continue to strengthen and reinforce the conclusion that Sandy Hook was a drill, that no children died and that it was done not only to promote a far-reaching gun-control agenda but to introduce a new billion-dollar industry of health care for school children, including drug therapy, which President Obama signed on 16 January 2013, only a month after the alleged massacre.
Sandy Hook “From A to Z”
The evidence they discuss includes that many web sites for donations to the families of the victims were up before the shooting occurred, which Dr. Eowyn has documented. For additional stunning evidence that should not have been present prior to the alleged shooting, “Sandy Hook Deception: Associated Press stories & photos predate the massacre”. Which is one more especially striking way we know that it didn’t happen.
Here is the latest and best presentation by Wolfgang Halbig about Sandy Hook. This very patient review of the evidence presents one case after another of the presence of evidence that should be absent and of the absence of evidence–such as a surge of EMTs rushing into the building to get those little bodies off to local hospitals to be declared dead or alive and the missing Med-Evac helicopter–that should be present. Test your Sandy Hook IQ by figuring out how many proofs we have that this was a hoax. Wolf is introduced at about 24:00.
The deeper, darker truths
by Dennis Cimino
When Sandy Hook first occurred back in the end of 2012, many of us who had done the research then began to see the inexorably linked events such as were Tucson and Aurora and for that matter the LAX staged shooting, the Dorner hoax, and the Boston PsyOpera hoaxes run under Project Longevity by Eric Holder, who has stated publicly that the American people ‘must be brainwashed’ about gun control. These hoaxes have been hastily but nonetheless deliberately cobbled together to control the way the people of the world think about gun ownership. Guns in the hands of the citizens, in any nation, have been and always were the last line of defense against despotic, rogue governments who’s sole purpose is to perpetuate (Project Longevity) the Rothschilds global financial hegemon.
This is not just about U.S. gun control, but gun control globally, stifling resistance by all of those who seek to unshackle from debt slavery. In the grand scheme of things, the United States has been in financial collapse now for a long time. The writing was on the wall once the FED (aka the Rothschilds), decided that they could print money at whim, which in the process thereby began to bring about a global collapse of all currencies as other nation states run by their central banks followed suit to keep the bubble from bursting and ending the charade known as modern day “capitalism”, a euphemism for fiat money laundering by acquisition of hard assets like precious metals, gold and silver, through a global “switch out” of worthless paper known as the U.S. dollar.
The Rothschilds have long since mastered the technique of trading worthless paper for hard assets. They own virtually half if not more of the world’s wealth, largely accomplished by means of relentless central bank thievery. As the United States begins to disappear into the quantitative easing ‘hole’ the Rothschilds built to bury this country in, the risks to the counterfeiters is very great. As much of the world has begun to awaken to the role of central banks, which have stolen the wealth of the sheeple, the end game as some of us see it, it is entirely possible that the only major obstacle to the brutal enslavement and impoverishment of the world is the American people and their arsenal. The stakes could hardly be higher.
Dennis Cimino was the Navy’s top EMI troubleshooter before he went to work for Raytheon in the 1980s. He is also the author of “Running out of time: Will the US attack the US again?”